What is Happiness according to Aristotle What is Happiness according to Aristotle

What Is Happiness According to Aristotle? The Pursuit of Happiness Explored in 5 Simple Points

Consider what it means to be truly happy. Is it the fleeting joy of indulging in a decadent chocolate dessert or the serene contentment that comes from finding inner peace? The pursuit of happiness has plagued mankind since time immemorial, and Aristotle, the revered philosopher of ancient Greece, had his own profound insights on the matter.

What is Happiness according to Aristotle? Happiness is not a mere emotion or a momentary burst of pleasure but rather a deeply rooted state of being. It is the ultimate goal of human existence—a holy grail that eludes many but beckons us with relentless allure.

Delving into Aristotle’s philosophy, we uncover a captivating exploration of happiness that goes far beyond material wealth and physical pleasures. From the intricacies of moral virtue to the quest for a meaningful life, Aristotle’s teachings provide us with a roadmap to unlock the secrets of true contentment.

1. Introduction to Aristotle’s Philosophy on Happiness

By dmbaker from Depositphotos

Aristotle, an ancient Greek philosopher, made significant contributions to various fields, including ethics and the understanding of human happiness. Born in 384 B.C., he studied under Plato at the Academy in Athens before establishing his own school, the Lyceum. His philosophical views have profoundly shaped Western thought, and his ideas about ethics and happiness remain relevant today.

Aristotle’s ethical theory revolves around the concept of ‘eudaimonia‘, often translated as ‘happiness‘ or ‘flourishing. However, Aristotle’s definition of eudaimonia extends beyond the common interpretation of happiness as mere pleasure or satisfaction.

For him, achieving eudaimonia is the ultimate goal in life, but it is neither simply virtue nor pleasure. Instead, it is the exercise of virtue, living a life in accordance with reason, that leads to true eudaimonia.

The Four Levels of Happiness According to Aristotle

To further understand Aristotle’s philosophy on happiness, it’s worth exploring his classification of four different levels of happiness. These levels range from the most basic, associated with immediate gratification, to the highest level, achieved through deep personal growth and contribution to others.

  • Happiness Level 1: Laetus. This level of happiness stems from material objects and physical needs. It is momentary and dependent on external circumstances.
  • Happiness Level 2: Felix. At this level, happiness is derived from ego gratification such as personal achievements, recognition, and success. While more enduring than Laetus, Felix is still dependent on external validation.
  • Happiness Level 3: Beatitudo. This level reflects the happiness derived from doing good for others and making the world a better place. It involves more profound personal fulfillment and has longer-lasting effects than the previous two levels.
  • Happiness Level 4: Sublime Beatitudo. The highest level of happiness according to Aristotle, Sublime Beatitudo involves the pursuit of truth and moral virtues, leading to a deep sense of inner peace and contentment.

In essence, Aristotle’s philosophy posits that genuine happiness or eudaimonia is not merely about feeling good but about being good – living virtuously and fulfilling our unique potential.


2. Understanding Eudaimonia: Aristotle’s Concept of Happiness

The common understanding of happiness is often tied to fleeting moments of pleasure or material gain. However, Aristotle offered a distinct perspective on happiness that challenges these familiar notions. His concept of ‘eudaimonia‘ is a profound exploration of what it truly means to lead a good and fulfilling life.

Aristotle’s Eudaimonia versus Contemporary Views of Happiness

Eudaimonia, a term originating from Greek philosophy, combines ‘eu’ (good) and ‘daimon’ (spirit). It has been defined as a life well-lived or human flourishing, a definition far removed from common interpretations of happiness.

Aristotle held that eudaimonia is the highest human good, desirable for its own sake rather than as a means towards some other end. This differs significantly from contemporary views of happiness, which often focus on transient states of emotion or tangible external rewards.

The Integral Role of Virtue

So how does one achieve eudaimonia? According to Aristotle, the key lies not in the mere pursuit of pleasure or virtue but in the exercise of virtue itself.

In his Nichomacean Ethics, he explained that happiness isn’t about satisfying appetites or accumulating wealth, power, or leisurely experiences. Instead, it’s about finding an ‘intermediate’, or a ‘golden mean‘ between deficiency and excess.

For instance, courage, as a virtue, is halfway between recklessness and cowardice. Thus, the path to eudaimonia involves rational activities where we strive to find balance and moderation in our actions and decisions.

Eudaimonia in Everyday Life

Source- Shutterstock

When we consider Aristotle’s approach to eudaimonia, it’s important to note that he doesn’t provide prescriptive advice. Instead, he offers a blueprint for how the rational, virtuous pursuit of eudaimonia might look in everyday life. This philosophical framework encourages us to reflect on our disposition and talents, and how we can use them to work towards self-realization.

While Aristotle acknowledged that external factors such as fate or luck can influence our happiness, he emphasized that it is our individual pursuit of virtue that truly defines our path to eudaimonia.

In essence, understanding and striving for eudaimonia requires a fundamental shift in how we perceive happiness. Rather than seeking instant gratification or external validation, we are encouraged to pursue a life of virtue, moderation, and rational action. It’s a journey towards a life well-lived, a journey towards flourishing in the truest sense.


3. The Three Pillars of Aristotle’s Philosophy: Ethos, Pathos, Logos

The fascinating world of Aristotle’s philosophy features three foundational concepts that form the bedrock of his teachings: ethos, pathos, and logos.

These components are much more than mere rhetorical devices used to sway an audience; they provide a comprehensive framework for understanding Aristotle’s vision of a fulfilling life and the pursuit of eudaimonia.

Ethos: The Credibility of the Speaker

The first pillar, ethos, emphasizes the credibility or character of the speaker. Aristotle argued that the strength of an individual’s ethos was crucial in influencing others, as an individual with a strong ethos is perceived as trustworthy and reliable.

The ethos concept transcends the simple notion of a person’s reputation.

It captures the essence of their moral fiber and integrity. Aristotle believed that by nurturing virtue within oneself, a person could strengthen their ethos, thereby enhancing their ability to lead, inspire, and steer themselves towards true happiness.

This ties back to our previous discussion on how Aristotle envisioned achieving eudaimonia through the exercise of virtue.

Pathos: Emotional Connection to the Audience

The second pillar, pathos, focuses on the emotional connection between the speaker and the audience. In Aristotle’s view, effective communication involves engaging the emotions of the listener, making them more receptive to the speaker’s message.

However, Aristotle did not advocate manipulating emotions superficially but rather fostering genuine empathy and understanding. He saw pathos as integral to navigating the complexities of human relationships and achieving meaningful connections with others, which he considered a critical aspect of eudaimonia.

Pathos can also be intertwined with ethos and logos, as shared beliefs and emotional responses can enhance the speaker’s credibility and make logical arguments more compelling.

Logos: Logical Argumentation

The third pillar, logos, embodies logical argumentation. Aristotle believed in the power of reason and logic as a means of discerning truth and making sound decisions. He advised that the best use of logos is to present points so straightforward and commanding that the audience reaches the same conclusions just moments before the speaker’s reveal.

This makes the audience relish the fact that they were clever enough to figure it out, heightening the satisfaction of the reveal. Aristotle’s emphasis on logos aligns with his larger philosophical framework, where rationality and intellectual virtue are essential for attaining eudaimonia.

Connection with the Pursuit of Eudaimonia

Understanding ethos, pathos, and logos as fundamental pillars of Aristotle’s philosophy provides keen insights into his perspectives on happiness and human flourishing.

In Aristotle’s view, cultivating a strong ethos (character), mastering the art of pathos (emotional engagement), and honing one’s skills in logos (logical reasoning) are not just tools for persuasive communication; they are essential pathways to achieving eudaimonia. These three pillars interact synergistically, supporting each other in the quest for a fulfilled life.


4. Virtue Ethics versus Duty-Based Ethics: Aristotle’s Stance

In the realm of moral philosophy, two distinct views often find themselves juxtaposed: virtue ethics and duty-based ethics. To understand Aristotle’s stance, we first need to elucidate these two concepts.

Aristotle’s Virtue Ethics

Virtue ethics, as conceived by Aristotle, places a great emphasis on developing one’s moral character. This philosophy is not simply about adhering to a set of rules or obligations but is more concerned with becoming a person of good moral character.

According to Aristotle, virtues are habits that we acquire through repeated action. They become ingrained in our character and guide our responses to various situations.

In this perspective, virtues like honesty, courage, and generosity are not just abstract ideals but practical guides for living a fulfilling life. By cultivating these virtues, one can achieve ‘eudaimonia‘ or a state of flourishing. T

he virtuous person does the right thing, at the right time, and in the right way, not out of obligation, but because it is their nature.

Duty-Based Ethics: A Contrast

On the other hand, duty-based ethics focuses on the actions themselves rather than the character of the person performing them. In this view, morality comes from adhering to certain duties or obligations.

These duties are often defined by a set of moral rules or principles, and moral worth is determined by the degree to which one fulfills these duties. It posits that a perfectly moral person is characterized by a strong sense of duty and obligation.

Aristotle’s Emphasis on Virtue

While both philosophies have their merits, Aristotle leans towards virtue ethics. For him, the essence of a good life and happiness lies in the cultivation of virtue.

Why is virtue so central to Aristotle’s philosophy? It’s because he saw virtues as the means to achieve ‘eudaimonia’. He argued that virtues enable us to navigate life’s challenges effectively and lead fulfilling lives.

In contrast to duty-based ethics, Aristotle’s virtue ethics doesn’t see morality as a matter of ticking off a list of duties. Instead, he envisioned a life where moral virtues are embodied and expressed in all of one’s actions. To Aristotle, the virtuous person doesn’t act out of obligation but out of a genuine disposition towards goodness.


5. The Platonic and Aristotelian Harmony in Pursuit of Happiness

Our exploration of happiness through the lens of ancient philosophy now turns to a comparison between the views of Plato and Aristotle. These two great thinkers had unique perspectives on many concepts, including happiness or “eudaimonia”.

Despite their differences, however, there is an underlying harmony in their thoughts on the pursuit of happiness which we shall try to uncover.

Examining the Harmony between Plato and Aristotle’s Philosophy

Source- Shutterstock

Plato and Aristotle, two towering figures in philosophy, have often been contrasted due to their different approaches. Plato’s philosophy is usually seen as abstract and utopian, while Aristotle’s approach is viewed as empirical, practical, and commonsensical. Yet, when it comes to the pursuit of happiness, their views show a surprising level of agreement.

One of the most striking examples of this harmony is their shared emphasis on the importance of reason and knowledge. Both philosophers believed that true happiness cannot be achieved without a deep understanding of reality. Notably, they both held that our senses play a crucial role in forming this understanding.

As Diffen explains, while Plato believed that senses could fool us, Aristotle argued that senses were needed to properly determine reality. Despite this difference, both agree on the necessity of using our rational faculties to interpret sensory information and achieve a clearer perception of reality.

How Their Ideas Complement Each Other in the Pursuit of Eudaimonia

While both philosophers agree on the importance of reason and knowledge in achieving eudaimonia, they differ on what constitutes the ultimate goal of life.

  • For Plato, the pursuit of eternal knowledge and achieving a metaphysical balance is central to his philosophy.
  • On the other hand, Aristotle’s concept of eudaimonia emphasizes the realization and perfect exercise of virtue. However, these two ideas do not contradict but rather complement each other in the pursuit of happiness.

In Aristotle’s view, virtues are not just rules to follow, but habits that enable us to live well and flourish as human beings. This coincides with Plato’s idea that a balanced soul, one that has attained wisdom and justice, is key to a happy life.

In essence, both philosophers suggest that true happiness is rooted in something beyond material possessions or transient pleasures. It lies instead in the cultivation of the self, the pursuit of knowledge, and the practice of virtues.


Frequently Asked Questions

Who was Aristotle?

Aristotle was a philosopher and scientist born in ancient Greece who is widely regarded as one of the greatest thinkers in Western philosophy.

What is happiness according to Aristotle?

According to Aristotle, happiness is the ultimate goal and meaning of human life. He defines it as the state of flourishing and living in accordance with virtue.

How does Aristotle define the concept of Eudaimonia?

Eudaimonia is a Greek term often translated as ‘happiness’ or ‘flourishing.’ According to Aristotle, it represents the fulfillment of one’s true potential and thriving in life through virtuous actions.

What are some practical ways to pursue happiness?

Aristotle suggests that to pursue happiness, one should foster virtuous habits, engage in meaningful relationships, develop intellectual curiosity, and live a life in harmony with reason and ethics.



What Is Happiness According to Aristotle?

As we draw to a close, it’s worthwhile reflecting on the overarching narrative of Aristotle’s philosophy and its enduring impact. Aristotle’s concept of happiness, or ‘eudaimonia’, is not a fleeting moment of joy or ephemeral pleasure; instead, it involves the attainment of all goods—health, wealth, knowledge, friends—that enrich human life over a lifetime.

This profound understanding prompts us to make choices, often challenging ones, steering us toward the perfection of human nature.

For Aristotle, happiness emerges from a life well lived, in which we align our actions and intentions with the highest ideals of human potential. It is a delicate balance, an intricate dance between the pursuit of pleasure and the cultivation of goodness.

As our minds wrestle with these complex notions, we may find ourselves caught in a tempest of conflicting emotions, oscillating between despair and enlightenment. And yet, amidst the chaos, there is a certain beauty in the ambiguity of happiness, an exquisite artistry hidden within its elusive nature.

The video below explains Aristotle’s theory of happiness in a very practical way. Must watch it:

And so, dear readers, I bid you farewell, hoping that in our shared journey, we may find solace in the pursuit of truth and the pursuit of our own happiness.